Neath and Port Talbot Watchdog (NPTW) Bookmark and Share   Welsh Translation

 

The fight for justice against corruption is never easy. It never has been and never will be. It exacts a toll on our self, our families, our friends, and especially our children. In the end, I believe, as in many individual cases, the price we pay is well worth holding on to our dignity.

 

Section Menu 

Links Menu 

Child Deaths Damned if you do' and 'damned if you don't' doesn't apply on this page! More..

Now for todays news!

Nasty Men!

Nasty Brexit!

Nasty Trump!

Thats All!

I think the BBC, Sky and all the rest of the crap UK TV news channels are suffering from some sort of 'PC Phobia'. After all they accuse us of suffering a mental illness (Phobia) if you say anything against Homosexuals, Transvestites, Feminists, the Royal Family or even Sir Mo Farah who now wants to be known as Sir Mohamed by the way.

Baby Z aged 14mths

Bristol Social Services
The life and death of Baby Z.
21 July 2007
James Barlow

The death of Baby P. (grim details here BBC) was shocking in the level of violence inflicted, but in the UK there are unfortunately plenty of fractured families where children face potential harm.

Here in Bristol, the body collectively responsible on our behalf for the protection (safeguarding) of children is the Bristol Safeguarding Children Board (BSCB). Looking at the Council's Key Performance Indicators for Children and Young People's Services, there are 274 children with Child Protection Plans (i.e. they are "at risk") and the parent(s) of 16 of those are on their second plan.

Where a child has died the anonymised serious case reviews are made available via the council. Let's have a look at a few extracts from the report on the death of "Baby Z". I'm not going to add any commentary, but I will offer you the report's conclusions first:

Conclusions [of the Serious Case Review]

Family situations involving parental substance misuse are complex and require co-ordinated assessment and activity, particularly as situations may change quickly. Relapse, particularly in the early stages of treatment, is likely.

Through her journey from chaotic drug use, into structured treatment, and then relapse, SZ appears to have been open with agencies as to her needs and issues. For those families who do not come within the threshold of child protection concerns, the co-ordinating processes between adult and child-focused services do not seem to be in place, as they are when child protection processes have been invoked. There are various points in this case, particularly where it was recognised that SZ was relapsing, where greater multi-agency working may have pulled children's social care in sooner, or kept them involved for a longer period.

Baby Z’s death was clearly avoidable, but the information considered by the panel does not indicate that any agency could have reasonably known that he was at risk of methadone ingestion, and at this point it is still unclear as to how he came to ingest it. There is no suggestion in this report that there was any failure in the inter-agency child protection system contributing to the death of Baby Z.

That was the conclusion. Now here's the detail.

Reason for this Serious Case Review

Baby Z died at home on 21st July 2007, aged 14 months, whilst in the care of his mother SZ, and her friend X. Both SZ and X have a history of drug misuse. When police attended they found evidence of drug taking, including spilt methadone. The cause of Baby Z's death is recorded as ‘morphine and methadone intoxication’. SZ was charged with manslaughter and was remanded in custody shortly afterwards. She pleaded guilty and received a 5-year prison sentence at Bristol Crown Court on 26th June 2008. [...]

Mother (SZ)
SZ was 29 years old when she gave birth to Baby Z. She had been known to social care services during her adolescence relating to concerns about her offending behaviour and drug use. In her adult life, SZ’s drug use continued to escalate, with her injecting both heroin and crack. She was also very vulnerable in terms of selling sex to fund this drug use. She received support and monitoring from several organisations, including Probation and drugs services. [...]

In November 2005, the Probation service and hospital became aware that SZ was pregnant and a referral was made to the specialist drug service. SZ commenced a treatment programme and accessed daily dispensing of methadone. A Pre-Birth Initial Assessment was completed by a Social Worker in liaison with other agencies. SZ attended all of her antenatal appointments, supporting the assessment that her drug use had stabilised and she was well motivated to change her drug using behaviour because of the impending birth of her child. She was described as “doing amazingly well.”

When Baby Z was born in hospital in May 2006, he was admitted for observation and treatment for methadone withdrawal. SZ and Baby Z were discharged from hospital 3 weeks later to temporary accommodation. SZ continued to remain stable on her methadone prescription and continued to see her Probation Officer. [I]n July 2006, SZ started a new relationship with AW, but shortly afterwards he was diagnosed with cancer. [...]

In September 2006 a referral was made to children's social care from the hospital where AW was being treated as an inpatient for cancer. AW was observed to pick Baby Z up by the ankle and ‘swing him’ onto the bed. An Initial Assessment was completed by a Social Worker following a home visit to SZ and Baby Z. A very warm relationship between them was observed. AW's handling of Baby Z was assessed as being a result of his own limited
mobility. [...]

Between January 2007 and April 2007 there were a number of indicators held within individual agencies that SZ was starting to get into difficulties. From an individual agency perspective those indicators were not followed up or shared with all the other agencies. If they had been, a collective picture may have emerged which would have indicated a higher level of concern. The presence of SZ and Baby Z during a police execution of a Drugs Warrant also presented a missed opportunity to link up increasing concerns about what was happening. [...]

In May 2007, the specialist drug service became concerned due to SZ missing appointments and her admission that she had returned to using crack and heroin on top of her methadone. A referral was made to children's social care and the GP and Health visitor were informed. As a result, a joint visit was made by a children and families Social Worker and the Health Visitor. The Social Worker felt that SZ was committed to getting back on track with her methadone programme. The home environment appeared clean, and Baby Z looked well cared for. The conclusion was that there were no immediate concerns for Baby Z’s welfare and that the Health Visitor would provide enhanced visits to monitor the situation.

In June 2007, SZ reported to the drugs worker that she was pregnant and suffering from morning sickness. She requested daily pick up of methadone, rather than supervised consumption. This was agreed as clinically appropriate. Her pregnancy was not reported to children's social care. [...]

Father (KZ)
There is little information in agency records on KZ. He has a history of criminal convictions going back to 1999 and appears to have had limited contact with his son. He is currently in HMP Dartmoor having been recalled on a Drug Treatment and Testing Order.

James Barlow